The diagnosis of schizophrenia can be based on several criteria. Those concerned may experience a series of emotional, but also cognitive, dysfunctions, experiencing a progressive, insidious flattening, associated with social withdrawal, non-compliance with treatment, as well as poor affective resonance. The symptoms are varied and affect the plane of thought, perception, behavior, liming, engraved on different subtypes, according to DSM V: paranoid, disorganized, catatonic, undifferentiated or residual. It is known and unanimously accepted that schizophrenia consists of a series of changes lasting more than six months and involves an active phase, which may be preceded by prodromal symptoms. Researchers have postulated numerous theories, including neurocognitive dysfunction, brain dysmorphology, neuromodulator abnormalities, but none of them possess the specificity and sensitivity of a diagnostic test. By substantially altering Kraepelin’s original concept, Eugen Bleuler introduced the term schizophrenia, introducing a fundamental dissociation between the obligatory and additional symptoms of the disease.Įven though there are certain criteria that allow the identification and diagnosis of schizophrenia, it still remains a clinical syndrome defined by the reported subjective experiences (symptoms) and the loss of social functioning (behavioral changes). The associated name was “praecox dementia”, based on longitudinal determinations in a wide range of clinical cases that came together in a common pattern. The one who managed to integrate these clinical manifestations into a nosological entity was Emil Kraepelin. In the mid-19th century, European psychiatrists focused their attention on diseases of unknown cause, which mainly affected young people, causing a chronic, progressive deterioration. The concept of schizophrenia is associated with a relatively recent origin. It is not compliant with the drug treatment,Īrguing that it “disturbs me and gives me changes of concentration”, whichĭestabilizes and disorganizes a possible ascent in the process of systematizingĪnd engaging the thinking in a near normality. Conclusions: He describes himself as a warrior whose vein is supported by a willingĮgo at all times to disintegrate. He is so deeply immersed in his own ideas about honor,Ĭonfabulation and self-control, which we “lose” him in what he claims to be: a Materializing the thoughts, the repeated jump between the abstract and concrete Patina of the speech, illogical constructions, the impossibility of Results: The patien t functions in the paranoid registry,īeing dominated by pseudo-hallucinations, ideas from the spectrum of xenopathy and control, joining formal andĬontent disorders (circumstantial discourse, tangentiality). Psychological evaluation, excluding brain organics, evaluation of intrapsychicĭynamics, observations. Material and method: Psychiatric evaluation, treatment initiation, (surveillance, “key room”) three weeks after Years ago with Escitalopram, Buspirone and Clonazepam, but the paranoidīackground culminated in his being admitted to a closed psychiatric regime It was pharmacologically approached seven Objective: Presentation of a patient aged 35, with a psychiatric history and It into a progressive disharmony, accentuated by acute psychotic episodes and Seems to absorb the normality known as a characteristic of the Self and transform The intense study of this condition, as well as theĪbsence of a theory for the mechanism of occurrence, gives it its own aura that Motivation: Paranoid schizophrenia, postulated in a macroscopic dimension, isĬonserved from consumption of the selves, perception, volition, cognition, affect,
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |